Does Questioning A Second Clinton Presidency Mean You’re Crazy?

From Sheldon Filger

Recently a major national magazine labeled three people who are opposed to Hillary Clinton becoming America’s 44th president as part of a “kooky clique.” As the author of “Hillary Clinton Nude: Naked Ambition, Hillary Clinton And America’s Demise” I happen to be one of this “gang of three.” It seems that if you can’t beat them with logic, just call them names.

The possibility that, for a second consecutive time, a previous occupant of the White House will have a close relation follow him should be a matter of serious national debate. The fact that opponents of Hillary Clinton’s presidential ambitions can be characterized as “crazy” by the national media reflects the deplorable state of political discourse in America. If anything, responsible media should be encouraging thoughtful debate on the advisability of having the Clintons regain control of the White House for potentially another 8 years. That is exactly what I try to do with my book. “Hillary Clinton Nude” poses challenging questions on the advisability of trusting America’s future to Hillary Rodham Clinton at this critical time. Perhaps those in the media who refuse to critically engage on this vital matter of Clinton rule should reexamine their role in the upcoming national debate. Being engaged rather than calling Hillary Clinton’s critics “kooks” would be a far more responsible-and patriotic-role for American journalism to follow.

Nearly seven years ago Bob Herbert, a liberal journalist, who certainly is not part of a “kooky clique,” wrote the following in his column in The New York Times:

“The Clintons Are A Terminally Unethical And Vulgar Couple, And They’ve Betrayed Everyone Who Has Ever Believed In Them.”

Source: Hillary Clinton Nude

Leave a comment

Please be polite and on topic. Your e-mail will never be published.

You must be logged in to post a comment.