Source: Macsmind

While the MSM continues to largely ignore the reemerging ‘China Gate scandal’ that I believe will either fatally wound or will outright derail her candidacy, it’s really time to call Hillary Clinton in her constant denials of culpability.

Norman Hsu funneling mo-lah through the Paw family is only the surface of that which is synonymous with democratic fundraising. Specifically with Hillary’s campaign - that is the campaign “finance shell game”. While it’s true that Hsu gave money to other candidates besides Hillary, I believe that it was simply another way to mask the money flow. Just as Hsu used a benign and anonymous family to play the “big donner”, so we should look at the possibility that some of that secondary money found its way into the back door of the Hillary campaign.

We all know by now that Hillary’s denials is legendary, and her denials about Hsu aren’t surprising. What is surprising is that thinks that we have no way of tracking them. For instance just six months ago there was another donor who turned out to be dirty and skated after being indicted for much the same thing - illegal contributions.
March 7th, 2007 New York Post.

“Dem Fundraiser Wanted For Theft

A Pakistani immigrant is wanted by federal authorities on charges he channeled $30,000 in illegal contributions to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential war chest.

The FBI is hunting Los Angeles businessman Abdul Rehman Jinnah, who vanished soon after his grand-jury indictment for violating federal election laws last May.

Clinton’s camp has denied any knowledge of Jinnah’s scheme, which is also alleged to have funneled more than $50,000 in illegal donations to the political action committees of Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), the Los Angeles Times reported yesterday. “

Even in her denials she loses, simply by showing ineptness at running her campaign. That’s a leadership flaw.

As the probes into Mr. Hsu’s activities begin to go under the federal microscope the constant re-connects to Hillary will come to light. He patented response of “I had no knowledge” is going to wear thin with voters, especially those with memories of her husband’s issues.

Bill Clinton was called “The Teflon President” as nothing that was ever thrown his way never seemed to stick. But his time was before the internet, the blogs which bring a much higher level of scrutiny. She’s not only skating on thin ice, but ice with cracks.

Hsu isn’t the first dirty donor, but he’s the one the feds have now and they are going to continue digging further until all the tentacles of his giving are known.

Source: Macsmind