Giuliani Slams Clinton’s on Terrorism

"Islamic terrorists killed more than 500 Americans before Sept. 11. Many people think the first attack on America was on Sept. 11, 2001. It was not. It was in 1993," said the former New York mayor.

Giuliani argued that Clinton treated the World Trade Center bombing as a criminal act instead of a terrorist attack, calling it "a big mistake" that emboldened other strikes on the Khobar Towers housing complex in Saudi Arabia, in Kenya and Tanzania and later on the USS Cole while docked in Yemen in 2000.

"The United States government, then President Clinton, did not respond," Giuliani said. "(Osama) bin Laden declared war on us. We didn’t hear it."

In hindsight, Giuliani said, maybe it’s all clearer now, "but now is now, and there is no reason to go back into denial, and that is essentially what the Democratic candidates for president want to do: they want to go back, to put the country in reverse to the 1990s.

Read more here

Help spread the word about nohillaryclinton.com
Put one of these "ugly banners" on your email signature, blog, website or myspace site!
Click examples to see selections

Chapter 3: The Other Women

Chapter 1

Chapter 2

Demand don’t “Ask” for an Refund

Pass this page along to EVERYONE on your mailing list and ask them to do the same!
Bleed them dry!

Will Bloomberg sink Hillary?

Posted by Vince Foster

Not sure how I feel about this - I’ve always thought that Bloomberg  was big buddy’s with Hillary.
Check out this video IF you can stomach it - Bloomberg looks like he is dying to help Hillary with her little video.
Maybe he thinks he can help Hillary win - but who in their right mind would vote for this guy?

By Pat

The presidential candidacy of New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg is already a smashing success.

A mere change of registration from Republican to independent has garnered him a cornucopia of free and favorable publicity some candidates do not receive in a year of campaigning.

The mayor has replaced Fred Thompson as the most talked-about non-candidate since Mario Cuomo in 1992 and Colin Powell in 1996. Gov. Cuomo and Gen. Powell, after scouting the terrain, declined to engage. That may be good advice for the mayor. Enjoy and exploit the media frenzy you will create between now and decision day, but think long and hard before plunging in. For, after that, the fun stops, the risks of national humiliation rise, and you are fair game for hostile media and the opposition researchers.

While impossible to see how Mayor Bloomberg can win, even if he spent $2 billion, it is easy to see how he sinks Hillary Rodham Clinton. For the more popular he makes himself with his media buys, the more votes his candidacy attracts, the more certain it is that he does for the Democratic Party what Ross Perot did for the GOP in ‘92.

Read it all here

Hillary Clinton and Carmela Soprano

Posted by Vince Foster

From Captains Quarters -  visit him daily!

The ad clearly aimed at people who watched the final Sopranos episode, but these are people who have steeped in Carmela’s denial and sellout for eight years. That same exact dynamic appeared throughout the Clintons’ terms in office but especially after the Lewinsky affair in 1997. After sending his wife out as an attack dog, allowing her to accuse people of lying to torpedo her husband, Bill had to appear on national TV to admit everything of which he was accused.

Inexplicably, this created a short burst of sympathy for Hillary — which quickly receded when her appearances reminded people that she isn’t terribly sympathetic. She stuck with Bill and, as Carlson mentions, put on an act in front of cameras that made the two look like teenagers in school defiantly daring teachers to give them referrals for PDAs. (If you’re over 35, you’ll know what that means.) Clearly she knows what she gets with Bill, and the rational conclusion is that she’s sticking around for some reason that benefits her, and given his serial indiscretions, those reasons don’t appear marital. Voters inclined to distrust her for these reasons alone may find those reservations reinforced, and others reminded of a certain lack of authenticity that has been the hallmark of the Clintons all along.

She may have scored a few points for hipness with this ad. In the long run, though, equating Bill with Tony Soprano and herself with Carmela may have a kind of resonance that she’ll regret as her campaign progresses.

Read it all - it’s great!

From Margaret Carlson

Yet the Clintons have too much in common with the Sopranos to risk parodying them. Through eight seasons of mob life in New Jersey and eight years in the Clinton White House, America has been gripped by these two couples. Much of the fascination is with the wives: How much does she know? Why does she stay?

In the last two seasons, Sopranos writer David Chase made sure that Carmela was held to account. She’d become the person she denied she was to her therapist and priest — a co-conspirator who turned a blind eye to her husband’s sins to enjoy the fruits of his crime.

In Denial?

We don’t have a writer to give us the answer for Hillary, who is by no means in her last season. And the Clintons might not know. Did they muddle into the middle of the most treacherous question about them, or do it with eyes wide open? They might be in as much denial about themselves as Tony. He thought his nephew Christopher’s movie was great until someone told him the homicidal maniac at the center of it was him.

The ad touches close to the mother lode of Hillary’s vulnerability among some women. When you ask them why they don’t like her, they say it’s because they don’t understand why she makes goo-goo eyes at a guy who broke her heart multiple times and humiliated her daughter. After that, pretending to be a teenager in love makes them wonder what else she might be faking.

The Carmela-Hillary juxtaposition has been made before by others, and not in Hillary’s favor. For staying with a repeat philanderer, Carmela got to live in a McMansion, wear expensive jewelry and wield derivative power as Queen Bee of the mob families. Hillary got to be first lady with a good shot at the White House.

Thanks to Monica

If Hillary’s hoping we’ll be kinder to her than Chase was to Carmela, it’s hard to see why she would tempt the comparison herself. The only possible rationale is that every time voters are reminded how bad Bill is, her numbers go up. She might not be the senator from New York were it not for Monica Lewinsky.

The other curious thing about the ad is giving Bill a starring role so early in the campaign. It’s a mixed reflection of where she is as a candidate. She’s earned A’s in deportment, preparation, effort, neatness and debating but still isn’t doing as well as her campaign had hoped when they said Bill would remain behind the scenes fund-raising until the fall, at the earliest.

Bill is now scheduled to go to Iowa, where Hillary is behind, over the July 4th holiday. While she leads in national polls among Democrats, she lags in some primary states and in most one-to-one matchups with Republicans. The Clintons may recognize that this is the first presidential election to be held in an odd-numbered year. If they wait until 2008 to use Bill, it could be too late.

The biggest problem with playing the Sopranos is that no matter how much viewers found Tony a sympathetic character or felt sorry for Carmela for being married to a murdering sociopath, they don’t want either in the White House. The person who had the bright idea to make the ad should get a promotion, but the person who approved it should be fired, unless it’s the candidate herself.

Unlike the Sopranos, in the saga of the Clintons, there will be a final accounting before the screen fades to black.

 

The Felonies That SHOULD Bring Down Hillary Clinton

Posted by Vince Foster

From Gateway Pundit - visit them daily!

The New Media Journal is reporting on the Hillary Campaign Finance Felonies this morning.
And, Doug from Upland put together this easy to understand video explaining the case against Hillary Clinton:
(8:22)
The video that was released last week is going to make things very difficult for Hillary Clinton. It’s just too bad the liberal media does not believe this story is newsworthy- It’s not a damning video about George W. Bush or Dick Cheney after all.

Free Republic has several posts on the alleged felonies:

** Hillary Is a Felon: Just Released Tape Proves Crime
** Smoking gun’ Hillary tape filed in court Video records alleged felonies
** HILLARY CLINTON ENGAGED IN FELONIES CAUGHT ONVIDEO SUBMITTED FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW IN CALIFORNIA
** Full Hillary ‘smoking gun’ video released
** DFU PRESENTS - Hillary Clinton Felonies Caught on Tape is now on YouTube - send it everywhere!
** Hillary Campaign Finance Felonies Caught on Video

Now… If you really want to get into the details of this latest Clinton scandal, you can wade through the muck at:

Hillcap.org
The Peter Paul vs Hillary and Bill Clinton Album
Equal Justice Foundation
Peter Paul

These websites are all dedicated to the "Largest Election Law Fraud in History."

Previously:
Hillary Implicated In "Largest Election Law Fraud in History"
HOT!… More Goods on the Latest Clinton Scandal! (Video)

Help spread the word about nohillaryclinton.com
Put one of these "ugly banners" on your email signature, blog, website or myspace site!
Click examples to see selections

Democrats have a BIG Hillary problem.

Hillary Clinton. The very mention of her name divides people. They either love her or they hate her, and they do so with equal passion. Ever since she first stepped into the Senate over 6 years ago, it was the worst kept secret in the political world that Hillary Clinton burned with a desire to be president, and now here we are in 2007 with Mrs. Clinton as the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination. Not only is she out front, but if the polls are to be believed, she could have a vice grip on the Democratic nomination as soon as the end of February 2008. However, it seems that most Democrats have not stopped to ask themselves is nominating Hillary Clinton a good idea? The crux of the Clinton campaign argument is that she can win in the November and bring the White House back to the Democrats, but wasn’t this the exact same reason John Kerry was nominate in 2004? Even more so, isn’t every nominee expected to win?

The reality which the Clinton campaign smartly avoids is that a Hillary nomination makes the task of winning the White House much tougher than if any of the other less polarizing Democrats were to be selected, because Hillary Clinton will never be popular. (She has the warmth and personality of Al Gore and John Kerry. She doesn’t even have an experienced public record to run on, and no, being First Lady does not count as experience. America didn’t choose her for the job. She was part of the package that America did elect, her husband Bill). All of her shortcomings could be easily overcome if she would take clear stands on the issues, and truly lead, but she has chosen to run a campaign where she says a little as possible about the issues. Vagueness and generalities are the marks of the Clinton campaign so far.

 The other big problem for Hillary is the war in Iraq. No one who has studied her record now believes that she is against this war for any other reason than this is what a majority of Democrats want. When the war was popular, Hillary was pro-war, but now that it isn’t she has hopped on the get the troops out bandwagon. If what I have written is true, then why is Hillary Clinton winning? She is winning because she and her husband are the most powerful force in the Democratic Party. For example, who stands to benefit most from a frontloaded primary system that emphasizes name recognition and the ability to spend money to advertise over grass roots campaigning? There is only one candidate in the Democratic field who fits this description, and that is Hillary Clinton. A frontloaded campaign allows the Clinton team a chance to hide her weaknesses, and market their candidate through advertising as a woman and a winner.

In short, the Democratic leadership is railroading much of the Party’s base into voting for Clinton. The deck is really being stacked against an Obama or Edwards. The Democratic Party establishment wants Hillary Clinton to win. They don’t want her to be seriously challenged. They want their nominee selected early and to emerge relatively unscathed from the primary process. Barack Obama thus far has been a good party solider and refrained from pointing out Mrs. Clinton’s obvious flaws. John Edwards has been critical of Clinton, but with each passing week, his chances of winning the Democratic nomination appear to grow more remote. So besides her obvious shortcomings in the personality, experience, vision, and popularity areas what else is wrong with her?

Read more here

Sodomists, Prostitutes and Pornographers for Hillary

     

Posted by Vince Foster

Story from World Net Daily - visit them daily!

Human Events, the national conservative weekly newspaper, has for some time been publishing a column entitled "HILLARY WATCH."

This column has just published the Washington Examiner’s report that Mrs. Clinton has been endorsed for president of the United States by Deborah Jeane Palfrey.

And who is Deborah Jeane Palfrey? Surely you have not already forgotten this woman who has been labeled "The D.C. Madam"? Deborah Jeane allegedly is owner of one of the nation’s most high-priced prostitution rings – operating under the euphemism of an "escort service."

Madam Deborah told the Examiner: "I am pulling for Hillary in 2008 because she’s great, bright and articulate."

"Meanwhile, the website PR.com recently interviewed adult film star Jenna Jameson, who also revealed that she supports Hillary for president. Ms. Jameson said, "I love Hillary. I think that in some ways she’s pretty conservative for a Democrat, but I would love to have a woman in office. I think that it would be a step in the right direction for our country, and there would be less focus on war and more focus on bettering society." The porn star also said, "The Clinton administration was the best years for the adult industry, and I wish that Clinton would run again."

The column – and no other media of which I am aware – had any Clinton campaign rejection, repudiation, or disassociation of these two Hillary endorsements from the realms of prostitution and porn.

In the realm of sodomy-acceptance, the column, along with other media, reported:

Hillary recently held her first major fundraiser targeting gay campaign donors for the 2008 presidential election. Several hundred guests showed up at D.C.’s Mayflower Hotel for the event. Despite Hillary’s trepidation about supporting same-sex "marriage," she still has solid support in the gay community. Hilary Rosen, a recording industry lobbyist and a host of the fundraiser, admitted that "there’s obviously some disappointment about marriage," but since all the main Democratic candidates are "consistent on that issue, that’s kind of taken off the table here." Rosen also said, "I think there’s a growing awareness among the community that, like so many other issues, Sen. Clinton understands how to address the complicated issues of supporting gay families and partnerships and dealing with discrimination issues. And I just think she’ll be a smarter, better president for our community."

And so, Ms. Rosen, do the leaders of prostitution and porn.

That’s a real electoral combo: SPPH – Sodomists, Prostitutes and Pornographers For Hillary.

Hillary Clinton and Illegals/Amnesty Votes

I’m convinced Hillary will do anything to get votes - including the ability of Illegals - or newly amnesty voters to push her into the White House.

CALL WASHINGTON NOW!

Different take on Clinton Sopranos Spoof