Obviously, there are many American women who instinctively know that Hillary Clinton is a devoted Marxist, and as the book says, has been one since her days in college. She will not get our vote.

 But there are other women, who went through the “feminists” movement and who consider themselves still feminists and therefore think that it is time for a woman President. Maybe so— but not Hillary Clinton. Let me tell you why.

Hillary Clinton is as far from being a feminist, as a potato is from being an orange.

Hillary is not independent, just neurotic. And despite her habit of punching men from the time she could walk, she is a coward.

Not someone we should have leading the United States in this dangerous time.

First off, (this being a more serious blog from me) I was a “feminist” at one time. I read all the “feminists” books. I wanted to be independent, I fell for it all. But, what I didn’t know at the time was that I was already independent, because I had a wonderful role model.

I was the daughter of a woman who ran a printing company. It wasn’t big— there were only about thirty union employees, but it wasn’t small either. Sure, she inherited it from her father, but she learned the whole business from top to bottom. She was the President, the Vice President, the auditor…she did the bids, answered the phones, worked in the bindery, managed the payroll, and when anyone came in the door, she was the first one anyone saw.

She was the first one there, the last to leave, and she would work in the bindery on weekends. On top of that, she kept the house, did the laundry, and cooked.

Read it all here