Yes, ladies and gentleman, one of our pathetic politicians on the Cut and Run side (Democrat) Rep. Lynn Woolsey, had the brilliance to invite Nutcase Cindy Sheehan to be their guest at the State of the Union Address! How pathetic! But leave it to the Democrats to be so tacky as to invite the very woman who was rubbing elbows with Hugo Chavez days ago! Oh and how could I forget she didn’t waste any time before getting arrested moments before the President was to give his State of the Union Address.

Cindy Sheehan, the mother of a fallen soldier in Iraq who reinvigorated the anti-war movement, was taken into custody by police in the House gallery Tuesday night just before President Bush’s State of the Union address.

Police escorted Sheehan from the visitors’ gallery above the House chamber after causing a disruption, said a Capitol Police official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because details of the incident were sketchy.

Rep. Lynn Woolsey, D-Calif., had invited Sheehan to the address as her guest.

Update: Sheehan had received a House gallery pass to attend the speech as a guest of San Francisco Democrat Lynn Woolsey, whose spokesman told reporters that protesting Peace Mom had promised to remain respectful and not cause any disruptions while the president spoke.

“Peace Mom” Cindy Sheehan’s was arrested at Tuesday night’s State of the Union address after she refused to yield to warnings from Capitol Hill police to cover up an anti-war T-shirt she was wearing underneath her coat.

Capitol Police Sgt. Kimberly Schneider told the Associated Press that Sheehan kept the anti-war slogan covered until she took her seat. When they noticed her politically charged attire, police warned Sheehan that such displays were not allowed.

The celebrated anti-war protester ignored the warnings, police said.

Police handcuffed Sheehan and escorted her from the gallery about 15 minutes before the president arrived.

On the night of President Bush’s State Of The Union Address, Hillary invites as her guest a Bush-Bashing 9/11 Widow! Monica Gabrielle has in the past, accused President Bush of exploiting the attacks for political purposes, calling the move “despicable.”

This is clearly a ploy to stick it to the President who will most likely speak about the 9/11 tragedy.

“Let’s see if we get some truth,” a hostile-sounding Gabrielle told the News.

“You know, this happened on his watch,” she complained in 2003. “If he wants to show a picture of 9/11 depicting what he was doing [during the attacks], it should be a picture of him sitting and reading in a classroom to school children. That’s where he was on 9/11.”

Isn’t it interesting she is Hillary’s guest and she does not have any harsh words of the 8 years of neglect of Hillary and Bill’s reign as Commander in Chief!

A little reminder of the Clintons endly avoidance of the growing terrorist cloud looming over this country lets review some interesting points.

BILL CLINTON’S ULTIMATE LEGACY
“What haunted me more than anything else was that [President Clinton] refused to make a decision. Human lives were at stake – the lives of American service members and the lives of our allies who opposed Saddam at our behest and were now under attack. At a time when America’s honor and grander principles were being challenged and the world was watching our every move… the president was watching golf.
“…I approached the president and said, “Sir, our aircraft are ready, bombs loaded, and waiting for your command…His reply destroyed my faith in him as commander-in-chief and convinced me that the greatest security risk to the United States was none other than…the president himself.”
— Lt. Col. Robert “Buzz” Patterson, USAF (Ret.), author of “Dereliction of Duty: The Eyewitness Account of How Bill Clinton Compromised America’s National Security,” recalling his three different attempts to pull Clinton away from watching the Presidents’ Cup long enough to give the go-ahead to bomb Iraq on Sept. 13, 1996. With lives hanging in the balance, Clinton, all three times, replied that he would deal with it later.

Even as the second anniversary of Sept. 11 arrives, the Left is still tirelessly re-scripting this ultimate legacy of the Clinton-Gore Administration: The gross negligence and complete dereliction of duty of Bill Clinton in preventing the worst terrorist attacks ever perpetrated on American soil. For this reason, Clinton’s role on Sept. 11, and why he must be held accountable for his blood-guiltiness, can never be overemphasized.

Undoubtedly, our nation has paid a heavy price for Clinton’s backing down in response to murderous despots during his own criminal reign. In other words, during his calamitous tenure as president of the greatest country in the world, Clinton had shown that national security was never his top priority.
In fact, more terrorist attacks occurred on Clinton’s watch, both inside and outside of U.S. borders, than during any other presidential administration in U.S. history:

• The 1993 World Trade Center bombing that killed 6 and injured 1,000
• The 1993 Mogadishu firefight that killed 18 U.S. soldiers
• The 1995 Oklahoma City terrorist attack on the federal building by American extremists that killed 168, wounding several hundred others
• The 1995 Saudi Arabia car bomb that killed 5 U.S. military personnel
• The 1996 Khobal Towers bombing that killed 19 U.S. soldiers, wounding 515
• The 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa that killed 231 citizens, 12 Americans and injured 5,000
• The 2000 USS Cole attack in Yemen that killed 17 U.S. sailors, wounding 39

With each terrorist attack, Clinton went before the American people and promised that “those responsible would be hunted down and punished.” However, we now know that nothing came of Clinton’s empty promises but spineless, politically driven, Wag-the-Dog diversions.

Isn’t it a riot, the Radical Hillary Clinton after years and years of cultivating the radical left is now being harassed by the very same nuts! The Clintons could always be counted on to be in the corner of the most radical elements of our society, now those very same loons are haunting Hillary everywhere she goes! Some people think this is all a drama the left is orchestrating to try to paint Shrillary as being sooo “Moderate” that the left wing (all along are in her back pocket) just can’t stand her on her “Centrist Positions.” Every aspect of Hillary’s public life is staged and calculated. So far, I don’t think this theory is panning out - but the Clintons are so Machiavellian we will keep an eye on this concept.

Clinton defends her Iraq stance in Portland, drawing cheers, boos Campaign - The senator says U.S. troops can come home as Iraq stabilizes, providing its own security Sunday, January 29, 2006 >JEFF MAPESThe Oregonian

Judging by Hillary Rodham Clinton’s fundraising stop in Portland, it won’t be a boring campaign if she runs for president in 2008.

The New York senator vigorously defended her middle-of-the-road position on the war in Iraq to the cheers of hundreds of admirers — and the jeers of several anti-war protesters who infiltrated her appearance and repeatedly interrupted her speech late Friday at the Portland Hilton.

Ever since the former first lady became a national figure, she’s been a lightning rod for praise and criticism. She’s been alternately hailed as a role model for women and reviled as a Machiavellian force seeking power by any means.

Now, as polls put her at the top of the list of potential candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination, she’s in the flurry of another divide — this time on the left side of the political spectrum over the war in Iraq.

Clinton voted to authorize President Bush to invade Iraq and continues to disagree with an increasing number of Democratic politicians who want to begin withdrawing troops from Iraq. At the same time, she accuses Bush of misleading Congress before the war and of mismanaging the occupation.

Before her speech, as many as 50 protesters demonstrated outside the Hilton as they carried such signs as, “Hillary, you’re not listening. Bring the troops home.”.

“I think she has left the Democratic Party behind,” said protester Linda Wiener of Code Pink, an anti-war group that helped organize the demonstration. She said Clinton has been trying to move to the political center to position herself for the presidential race.

Afterward, Wiener and as many as a dozen demonstrators managed to get into the ballroom and repeatedly interrupt her speech with shouts of “Hillary supports the war!” and “Stop the War!” At one point, they displayed an anti-Clinton banner that was ripped down by supporters as security guards repeatedly hustled out protesters who popped up in various parts of the ballroom.

Read the rest of this entry »

New Yorkers… Hillary does not care what you think, your votes are just stepping stones in her path to the White House. And stepping stones should have no opinions! It is Hillary’s Birthright to hold this office.

ALBANY, N.Y. — Most New Yorkers don’t think Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton could win a 2008 presidential race, according to a newly released poll.

Fifty-one percent of those voters told Marist College’s Institute for Public Opinion that Clinton would be treated more harshly than other presidential candidates because of who she is.

Marist pollster Lee Miringoff said Clinton “comes with controversy.”

Forty-nine percent of New York voters in the Marist poll said Clinton should not run for president, while 41 percent said she should.

While 59 percent said they expect Clinton to run for president, 62 percent said it is unlikely she could win.Meanwhile, 53 percent said Republican Rudolph Giuliani should run for president in 2008.

Read it all here

Well, it looks like American has rejected the new ABC show Commander in Chief. I have to admit I’ve never seen the show but it was obvious it was an attempt to get the population accustomed to a female President. The reason I feel confident to make that statement is due to the show having Hillary’s fingerprints all over it.
ABC insiders denied there’s any connection between the Hillary Campaign and the series. But look who was one of the main writers in the show turns out to be Steve Cohen who served as the then first lady’s deputy communications director throughout the 1990’s!

“Commander in Chief” started out as the season’s most talked-about new show, but the initial hype didn’t translate into solid ratings – and ABC has shelved the White House drama.

The network announced over the weekend that it is pulling the show – which stars Geena Davis as the first female president – until spring to make way for a new comedy, “Sons & Daughters.” The “Commander” show will be off the air for at least six weeks, the New York Post reports.

That can’t be good news for Hillary Clinton. NewsMax columnist James Hirsen has called “Commander in Chief” a “series-style Hillary campaign commercial.”

ABC insiders denied there’s any connection between Hillary and “Commander.” But the show’s lead writer, Steve Cohen, served as the then-first lady’s deputy communications director in the 1990s.

In October, NewsMax reported that disgraced former national security adviser Sandy Berger had signed on as an adviser to the show, joining fellow Clintonistas Cohen and Capricia Marshall, the former social secretary for the Clinton White House.

“Hillary operatives” were monitoring the show “as a barometer of how she might fare in ’08,” the New York Daily News reported at the time.

In that case, the show’s failings don’t portend well for Hillary. After attracting an audience of 16 million when it premiered in September, “Commander” drew barely 10 million last week, its lowest audience ever.

The organization’s co-chairman Richard Mason said the show would help in the “mainstreaming of the idea of having a female commander in chief,” the Post reported.

Queen Shrillary Clinton in an attempt to finesse the latest polls that the American public does not want her came out with this jem:

Americans are growing ‘impatient” as they wait for a woman to be elected president, 2008 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said Saturday night.

“People are saying,’ Well, at least we’re ready,’” Clinton told interviewer Jane Pauley, as the two held a public chat for charity in San Francisco.

“There’s a feeling that it’s time,” she added.

Then, in quotes picked up the New York Sun, the former first lady said she detected “a certain impatience” to see a female president following the election of women to similar roles in other countries.

This is in direct contridiction to the latest Gallup poll that found last week that 51 percent of Americans had already made up their minds not to vote for her!

And not leaving an oppurtunity to bash President Bush she had this to say:

“I think that basically we are now watching a deliberate policy of neglect take root,” Hillary complained.

She then suggested that the White House didn’t want to rebuild New Orleans because “all those Democrats might come home.”

Steve Emerson: Hillary Clinton and Hamas
Read Newsmax daily!

2008 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton wasted no time last Thursday denouncing Hamas after the terror group’s big win in the Palestinian parliamentary elections.

But as noted terrorism expert Steven Emerson pointed out when Mrs. Clinton first ran for the Senate, relations between the top Democrat and supporters of the notorious anti-Israeli organization haven’t always been so chilly.

In fact, in a November 2000 report on OpinionJournal.com headlined “Hillary and Hamas,” Emerson noted that Mrs. Clinton “has met repeatedly” over the years with “groups that had openly supported Hamas, Hezbollah and other foreign terrorist organizations.”

Hillary launched her outreach program to U.S. Muslim leaders beginning in 1996. But as terror expert Emerson observed: “Curiously, nearly all of the leaders with whom Mrs. Clinton elected to meet came from Islamic fundamentalist organizations.”

Among the most troubling terror-friendly groups cultivated by the former first lady was the American Muslim Council, an organization that had “clearly established a record in support of radical Islam,” he said.

Read the rest of this entry »

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — An Iranian religious center has sent Chelsea Clinton several books explaining the Koran, Islam’s holy book, a newspaper reported Thursday.The Akhbar daily newspaper did not say whether Chelsea requested the books from the Amir Momenan Scientific and Religious Research Center, which is in the central city of Isfahan.

On Monday, another newspaper, the Tehran Times, reported that the center had sent a copy of the Koran to President Clinton’s daughter at her request. Chelsea is a freshman at Stanford University.

The center has been known to send English-language translations of the Koran to people in the United States, Canada and Japan who have requested them. The Koran is written in Arabic.

The other books sent to Chelsea included three English-language texts explaining the Koran and a book of sayings by Islam’s prophet Mohammed, Akhbar said.

The United States severed relations with Iran after Muslim militants stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran in November 1979 and took 52 Americans hostage for 444 days. The Islamic Revolution toppled the U.S.-backed shah.

Will Sen. Hillary Clinton’s next role be in a film about women’s pre-menstrual syndrome?

The answer is yes, if Hollywood’s Rosanna Arquette gets her way.

According to the World Entertainment News Network, the star of “Desperately Seeking Susan” wants to have the New York senator play a part in a documentary about PMS.

I understand this was the audition tape that might “seal the deal.”
Listen here - click arrow!

Gee… I hope this movie part does not typecast here!
Read More Here

You know how our kids may talk about what we do at our jobs, well……..

One day a fourth-grade teacher asked the children what their fathers did for a living. All the typical answers came up — fireman, mechanic, businessman, salesman, doctor, lawyer, and so forth. But little Justin was being uncharacteristically quiet, so when the teacher prodded him about his father, he replied, “My father’s an exotic dancer in a gay cabaret and takes off all his clothes in front of other men and they put money in his underwear. Sometimes, if the offer is really good , he will go home with some of them.The teacher, obviously shaken by this statement, hurriedly set the other children to work on some exercises and then took little Justin aside to ask him, “Is that really true about your father?”"No,” the boy said, “He works for the Democratic National Committee and is helping to secure the nomination of Hillary Clinton, but I was too embarrassed to say that in front of the other kids.”